At what point do we break up the USA?

At what point do we break up the USA?

If your answer is “NEVER!” accompanied by some version of “How could you even consider seriously considering such a thing?!”, then you are a cultist.

An Americultist.

For the non-Americultists out there, the question – and it is an important one – stands:

At what point do we break up the USA?

How about at the point DC enforces a policy of open, systematic, “legal” child sacrifice?


That’s been going on for decades. We’re apparently not willing to stand against the America Idol over that one.

What about the DC-imposed obliteration of marriage and the DC-enforced imposition of “gay marriage” across the land?

Nah, we won’t cut ourselves loose even after that.

The bottom line seems to be, for now anyway, that we’re way too thoroughly programmed, pimped out, and dependent on the DC-centered American Welfare/Warfare State for us to even consider severing the chains that we’ve come to love and depend upon.

But for more and more people, the question is building.

If we won’t break up the DC-centered State now, when will we?

What would push us over the line?

What would force us to finally say “no” and “goodbye” to American Statism?

There has to be a line somewhere, doesn’t there?

If not, we really are slaves, aren’t we?

We really are the most desperate and pathetic sort of cultists.

But if there is a point at which most of us can agree that secession or some other sort of solid, complete separation from DC power would become necessary, shouldn’t we be thinking now about what that point actually is?

Now consider this: What if, after beginning this thought process in a serious manner (many of us for the first time), we came to realize that the hard, impassable lines that we should set for secession or some similar thing were actually lines that were passed long ago by DC?

What if we came to realize that DC-imposed child sacrifice, “gay marriage”, and gender obliteration were more than enough to warrant – and even require – our leaving the DC-fueled anti-Christian empire?

What if along the way we realized that we actually should have broken up this DC beast a very long time ago?

Something to think about.

In order to help with this thought process, I want to share with you now another excellent article from the Mises Wire, simply titled Break Up the USA.

Check this out:

“Some of our assumptions are so deeply embedded that we cannot perceive them ourselves.

Case in point: everyone takes for granted that it’s normal for a country of 320 million to be dictated to by a single central authority. The only debate we’re permitted to have is who should be selected to carry out this grotesque and inhumane function.

Here’s the debate we should be having instead: what if we simply abandoned this quixotic mission, and went our separate ways? It’s an idea that’s gaining traction — much too late, to be sure, but better late than never.

For a long time it seemed as if the idea of secession was unlikely to take hold in modern America. Schoolchildren, after all, are told to associate secession with slavery and treason. American journalists treat the idea as if it were self-evidently ridiculous and contemptible (an attitude they curiously do not adopt when faced with US war propaganda, I might add).

And yet all it took was the election of Donald Trump for the alleged toxicity of secession to vanish entirely. The left’s principled opposition to secession and devotion to the holy Union went promptly out the window on November 8, 2016. Today, about one in three Californians polled favors the Golden State’s secession from the Union.

In other words, some people seem to be coming to the conclusion that the whole system is rotten and should be abandoned.

It’s true that most leftists have not come around to this way of thinking. Many have adopted the creepy slogan “not my president” – in other words, I may not want this particular person having the power to intervene in all aspects of life and holding in his hands the ability to destroy the entire earth, but I most certainly do want someone else to have those powers.

Not exactly a head-on challenge to the system, in other words. (That’s what we libertarians are for.) The problem in their view is only that the wrong people are in charge.

Indeed, leftists who once said “small is beautiful” and “question authority” had little trouble embracing large federal bureaucracies in charge of education, health, housing, and pretty much every important thing. And these authorities, of course, you are not to question (unless they are headed by a Trump nominee, in which case they may be temporarily ignored).

Meanwhile, the right wing has been calling for the abolition of the Department of Education practically since its creation in 1979. That hasn’t happened, as you may have noticed. Having the agency in Republican hands became the more urgent task.

Each side pours tremendous resources into trying to take control of the federal apparatus and lord it over the whole country.

How about we call it quits?

No more federal fiefdoms, no more forcing 320 million people into a single mold, no more dictating to everyone from the central state.

Radical, yes, and surely not a perspective we were exposed to as schoolchildren. But is it so unreasonable? Is it not in fact the very height of reason and good sense? And some people, we may reasonably hope, may be prepared to consider these simple and humane questions for the very first time.

Now can we imagine the left actually growing so unhappy as to favor secession as a genuine solution?

Here’s what I know. On the one hand, the left made its long march through the institutions: universities, the media, popular culture. Their intention was to remake American society. The task involved an enormous amount of time and wealth. Secession would amount to abandoning this string of successes, and it’s hard to imagine them giving up in this way after sinking all those resources into the long march.

At the same time, it’s possible that the cultural elite have come to despise the American bourgeoisie so much that they’re willing to treat all of that as a sunk cost, and simply get out.

Whatever the case may be, what we can and should do is encourage all decentralization and secession talk, such that these heretofore forbidden options become live once again.

I can already hear the objections from Beltway libertarians, who are not known for supporting political decentralization. To the contrary, they long for the day when libertarian judges and lawmakers will impose liberty on the entire country. And on a more basic level, they find talk of states’ rights, nullification, and secession – about which they hold the most exquisitely conventional and p.c. views – to be sources of embarrassment.

How are they going to rub elbows with the Fed chairman if they’re associated with ideas like these?

Of course we would like to see liberty flourish everywhere. But it’s foolish not to accept more limited victories and finite goals when these are the only realistic options.

The great libertarians – from Felix Morley and Frank Chodorov to Murray Rothbard and Hans Hoppe — have always favored political decentralization; F.A. Hayek once said that in the future liberty was more likely to flourish in small states. This is surely the way forward for us today, if we want to see tangible changes in our lifetimes. . . ”

Something to think about.

And something to encourage others to think about.

At every opportunity.

Through actual conversations.


Right now. (Or yesterday, ideally.)

It’s way past time that we got in gear on this, so let’s start asking and answering important questions that we’ve been programmed to ignore and avoid for far too long.

Questions like:

At what point do we break up the USA?





If you know of anyone who might appreciate this post, please share it. If you’d like to see articles like this continue, please click here to help.

Please also “like” us on Facebook, “+” us on Google+, follow us on Twitter and feel free to sign up for new articles by email using the buttons in the upper right corner of the FBC home page.

Please Check Out Bordered 400pw

Please check out The Fire Breathing Christian Podcast too, as well as the latest designs at Fire Breathing Tees and the latest memes at the Fire Breathing Memes page.

You can also help support the Fire Breathing Christian mission by checking out these books:

Stupid Elephant Tricks – The Other Progressive Party’s War on Christianity takes a painful but much needed look at how Christ-less “conservatism” has captivated Christians and co-opted them into helping march the culture ever deeper into darkness:

SET Blog Ad 550pw


The Beginning of Knowledge: Christ as Truth in Apologetics is an approachable, easy to read introduction to Christ-centered apologetics:

TBOK Blog Ad 550pw_____________________________________________________

Apathetic Christianity: The Zombie Religion of American Churchianity explores the tragic true horror story of all-American dead religion masquerading as Christianity:


On Education is a compilation of some of the most provocative and compelling Fire Breathing Christian articles on the subject of children’s education:

OE Amazon Ad 650pw


There Is No “God-Given Right” To Worship False Gods is a compilation of some of the most provocative Fire Breathing Christian articles on the subject of America’s embrace of a satanic approach to religious liberty:

TINGGRTWFG Amazon Ad 650pw


Fire Breathing Christians – The Common Believer’s Call to Reformation, Revival, and Revolution is the book that first presented the FBC mission to apply the Gospel-fueled Great Commission in every realm of God’s creation:

FBC Orig Blog Ad 550pw


An alternate white cover version of Fire Breathing Christians is available:

FBC White Blog Ad 550pw


There is also an alternate black cover version of Fire Breathing Christians:

FBC Black Blog Ad 550pw

Finally, here are a few good intro/reminder links for those of you who are new to Fire Breathing Christian and curious about exactly what’s goin’ on ’round here:

What are you, some kind of [insert label here] or something?!

What’s with that shark-fishie graphic thing?

Intro to Fire: The Power and Purpose of the Common Believer

When the Bible gets hairy. (Or: Is it right for men to have long hair?)

And especially this one: Never forget that apart from God’s grace you and I are complete morons.

Thank you for your support!


ISIS’s nightmare: Yazidi Kurdish female fighters are seeking to avenge their sisters

September 2016: Stacey Dooley embeds herself on the frontline with the extraordinary all-female Yazidi battalion, who are fuelled to take revenge against the so-called Islamic State.

As the battle to take Mosul from ISIS advances in Northern Iraq, in this extraordinary film for BBC Three, Stacey finds these young women’s lives have been transformed by a desire to avenge their loved ones who were murdered by ISIS.

In 2014, 50,000 Yazidis fled their ancestral lands in northern Iraq to Mount Sinjar, away from the advance of ISIS. Without food and water, thousands died on the mountain and the ones left behind were massacred or captured. More than 5,000 women were taken to be used as sex slaves, with an estimated 2,000 women remaining in captivity.

Two years after the genocide, Stacey spends two weeks with this battalion of brave young women. Formed by a renowned Yazidi singer, they have transformed into brave fighters. Many of them have escaped the incomprehensible horrors of ISIS and are determined to rescue Yazidi women still under ISIS control. These female fighters strike fear into the heart of the jihadists as they believe if they are killed by a woman they will not make it to the heavenly afterlife.

Stacey meets cadets at their training camp as they prepare to join the battalion, before journeying with them to the front line as they prepare to fight.

These women share with Stacey happy memories of their previous lives, and then the unimaginable trauma they have endured at the hands of ISIS. With extraordinary access, Stacey Dooley for BBC Three meets the young women seeking to avenge their sisters on the frontline with ISIS.



By Coach Dave Daubenmire
February 9, 2017

All of the sudden the word pedophile has wriggled its way into mainstream America. Just like the diabolical double of transgenderism and homosexuality, a generation ago the mere mention of those illnesses was something whispered out of earshot of anyone under the age of eighteen.As the book of Ephesians clearly states there were some topics that warned we “let it not be named once among you.” Even thought this spiritual wickedness has been around since the fall of man, the idea that such deviancy would ever be taught to our children was unthinkable.

Lest we forget, and before I duck for cover from the verbal grenades of the tolerance crowd, let me remind you that there was a time not so long ago when deviant sexual behavior was considered a mental illness by the American Psychiatric Association.

As history records it wasn’t until 1973, thanks to the “research” of deviant homosexual pedophile Alfred Kinsey and his pornographic book Sexual Behavior in the American Male that “scientific” research in regards to sexual behavior was reclassified. It would be safe to say that Kinsey and his gaggle of homosexualists were the first true science deniers. (Bone up…sorry for the poor choice of words… on homo-history here).

Deviant sex proponents have put on a full court press ever since. With the help of the ungodly courts and the lie of the separation between the church and the state they were successful in overturning nearly 6000 years of recorded history with the “legalization” of what God, and nearly all civil societies had deemed an abomination.

Today, talk of sexual options are as common and varied as more and more abominable sexual behaviors are thrust in front of innocent, unsuspecting children in kindergarten. It has given new meaning to asking children if they have learned their ABC’s.

What is going on in our public schools is nothing less than moral molestation.
I hate to go old fashioned on you but there was a time in America when we took seriously the crime of corruption of a minor.

The Law Dictionary defines it as “actions of an adult that convince or influence a minor to do something wrongful, criminal or immoral such as performing a sexual action.

In accordance with that there was also a crime of “improper influence” which was defined as “to attempt to convince someone to perform an act that is not proper or immoral or an offense which they would not otherwise commit had they not been influenced or convinced to do so

Today, we just call those two crimes “public education.” They simply changed the definition of “immoral,” classified it as normal, and shoved it down the throats (sorry again) of America’s elementary school students.

When will God-fearing “normal” Americans rise up and declare that enough is enough? Engaging in personal deviant behavior is one thing. Teaching it to unsuspecting innocent children is another. The molestation of the innocent mind is spiritual rape.

Pornography is defined as printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.” Look at this picture. Is this not intended to “stimulate erotic” feelings in the viewer? Is it not designed to “influence” confused children? Is this not emotional pornography?

What is the common thread in a vast majority of the sexual deviancy we see in America? Could it be the indoctrination of young innocent minds into the acceptance of abnormal sexual behaviors in our social experiment laboratories known as American Public Schools?

The sexual anarchists are running America. The promotion of sexual deviancy has led to an epidemic of brokenheartedness in parents who lost their precious children to the mental molestation masquerading as education in our deviant driven gender bender, amoral curriculum.

You may want to stop reading right here because what I am about to say is graphic…but it goes to the heart of the argument. CONTINUE AT YOUR OWN RISK.

America’s public schools are designed to shape society. We stopped “educating” our children a long time ago. The schools spend hours trying to convince children not to smoke cigarettes because it could be hazardous to their health. Yet they encourage them to engage in homosexual sodomy which is far more dangerous than smoking.

Let’s be honest here. Would you rather your teenage son was caught smoking in the restroom or sucking on his classmate’s camel? What is wrong with us?

I rejoice that Betsy DeVoss is the new Secretary of Education. I pray she oversees the shuttering of this diabolical cabinet. In the meantime…get your kids out of the public schools.

Rape is not always sexual. If we love our children the molestation of the mind must stop.

© 2017 Dave Daubenmire – All Rights Reserved

D.C. police arrest Trump inauguration domestic terrorists

Fellowship of the Minds

Mere days before President Trump’s inauguration, using hidden cameras, James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas captured video and audio evidence of a radical Left group plotting to disrupt and cause mayhem at the inauguration.

Members of DisruptJ20 were captured on video in Pizzagate’s Comet Ping Pong pizzeria discussing how they would disrupt the pro-Trump Deploraball on the night of January 19 at the National Press Building, Washington, DC, by releasing butyric acid stink-bombs into the ventilation system and setting off fire alarm sprinklers.

Those plans are outright terrorism and in violation of D.C. Code 22-3571.01(6) that carries a 5-year prison sentence:

“It shall be unlawful for anyone to willfully or knowingly, with the intent of intimidating or frightening people, causing panic or civil unrest….”

One of the terrorists, Luke Kuhn of the D.C. Anti-Fascist Coalition, was heard on the video threatening the D.C. government and the police:

“The message has to be, we…

View original post 543 more words